Deep learning notes 08: Fastformer - additive or static (self)attention?
This post if from a series of quick notes written primarily for personal usage while reading random ML/SWE/CS papers. As such they might be incomprehensible and/or flat out wrong.
Fastformer - Additive attention can(not) be all you need
- Modeling pairwise interaction between all pairs of tokens is expensive
- Fastformer promises to use “additive attention” that’s linear in complexity via tokens-global aggregation
- Presented in terms of queries,keys,valuesbut could be just in terms ofn(in this case 3) columns:a,b, …,z
- Computation goes sequentially, starts with computing the output of the second column, then third, …, last
    - For each column, create per-token input values, e.g. a1..an,b1…bn; the same wayq,k,vare produced in transformer
- For computing the per-token outputs of second column Bi, start withAi=ai
- For each Aivalue, produceαiweight via softmax after transformation with learnedwa,αi= exp(wa*Ai)/∑exp(wa*Aj)
- Produce global Aas weighted average ofAi,A = ∑ αi * Ai
- The output of column b is then pointwise multiplication, Bi = bi x A
- In case there’s column c, we aggregate Bito a singleB, pointwise multiply withcito getCi
 
- For each column, create per-token input values, e.g. 
- Still essentially quadratic i=0..n:Bi = bi x A = bi x ∑ αi * Ai = ∑ bi x αi * Ai- Given there’s no softmax -> global a can be computed first -> linear in computation
 
- The aggregation weights αiare essentially self-attention with per-column/layer static learned querywa- Also could be viewed as soft classification according to learned static separation boundary vector wa
 
- Also could be viewed as soft classification according to learned static separation boundary vector 
- No information sharing between tokens apart from pointwise multiplication between global aggregate of prev. column
    - Not really a proper attention; sort-of static query self-attention in the aggregation step
- It is statically learned what sort of tokens each layer/column should globally attend to; not dynamic per each token
- Good for tasks with global information, e.g. topic classification
 
- Seems to just be framed in terms of the words of attention mechanism
- In practice fast and with relatively good results on certain NLP tasks
    Written 
    by Petr Houška 
    on 
  
  
  
  
  
  
